Another lie from Little Green Footballs – h/t to @marcoesquondola
also LGF says he left his "laptop" with the pic on it unattended..i listen to O&A every day and it was his ipad and pic wasn’t on
Here’s what Charles Jonson accused Breitbart of …
In fact, two nights ago, Andrew Breitbart went out drinking with Anthony and several others — and according to Anthony, showed the picture to numerous people, even leaving his laptop computer unattended with the picture on the screen for long periods of time.
One of those people was right wing flamethrower Ann Coulter. Here’s Anthony’s photo of Coulter reacting to the picture; notice that his computer is apparently there, but Breitbart is nowhere to be seen.
Breitbart owns a Mac Air, an iPad and an iPhone.Blackberry. Look at the picture – that’s no Apple product.
And LizBuddie thinks it might not even be a computer.
That’s doesn’t look like a PC to me. Looks like a restaurant sign/stand, like the kind that hold menus.
And it seems Coulter is laughing at something she’s been told. Right? Not a picture on the imaginary Breitbart computer.
Chuck sees what he wants to see – maybe that’s where the little green footballs name comes from.
UPDATE: It’s a sign – here’s Google Street View
But Charles – a Mac junkie – won’t correct the obvious error.
Deviant Art
Facebook
Flickr
Google Reader
LinkedIn
StumbleUpon
Twitter
Vimeo
YouTube
{ 12 comments… read them below or add one }
Looks like Musto is holding a phone in left hand - maybe he showed her something. Charles is a tool.
Awesome mockery of @Lizardoid
http://twitter.com/#!/RocksEm/status/78721382132883458
See Alinsky Rule 5.
Yeah, that’s a menu board and Charles Johnson is every little bit of what he claims Breitbart is and more. LGF used to be known as “The blog that fact checks your ass.” Now, it’s “The blog that blows smoke up your ass.”
Wow, I had to see it to believe it.
That’s quite a hobby you’ve adopted, Lee (and not at all creepy!). Let me know when you go pro with this- I can’t wait to see a whole book fulla obsessive parsing of the doings of Anthony Weiner’s dick. Don’t listen to those folks who say that yours is psychotic behavior, okay?
Man, I love that logic. Little Green Fucktard lies about Breitbart, Stranahan points out said lie, and Stranahan is OBSESSED! Couldn’t be that Johnson is so obsessed with breitbart that he HAS to lie about him constantly. It couldn’t be that the guy penned an op-ed that was full of factually incorrect statements, in which a reader noticed.
Jesus, if Stranahan is obsessed with chuckles, then johnson is frothing-at-the-mouth-like-a-rabid-raccoon-who-hasn’t-been-fed-in-days obsessed with breitbart.
Again, the gymnastics these people go through. Obsessed? When was the last time a sitting congressman called a press conference only to have it taken over by a jounalist AT THE BEHEST of the press? The entire press is obsessed with breitbart. Someone’s gotta make sure they tell it like it is.
It should be obvious, Mark, that I was referring to more than just the immediate posting. Sorry I didn’t make that more clear, but frankly, I simply couldn’t imagine anyone’d be silly enough to necessitate it.
Chris, where exactly is the “obsessive parsing of the doings of Anthony Weiner’s dick” in this post? The penis in question has only a bit part in the whole Johnson fiasco.
Perhaps instead of casting aspersions you should defend Charles.
See comment and response just above yours, Tom. Thank you for reading carefully.
I did.
So you’re admitting this post has nothing to do with Weiner’s dick, yet you still have to lecture the author on his “obsession”.
You’re making even less sense now.
Its apparently an obsession to question the ethics of a congressman who lies to the country for ten days straight. Or is an obsession to report the facts?
Lee is obsessed with finding out the truth, even if it means someone he agrees with goes down as a lying liar face. Johnson is obsessed with breitbart.
I’ve been following Lee’s blogs for months now (uh oh, I’m obsessed!) and he’s never mentioned weiner before weiner tweeted his weiner. Lee covered it as a blogger/journalist. That you see that as an obsession shows what kind of lens you view the world through.
Guys, since you’re fans of Breitbart, it may be necessary to simply spell it out: Disingenuousness isn’t an argument; it’s a dodge- the act of a coward. Probably, like Breitbart, you tell yourself that you dislike dishonesty, but are here being dishonest in pretending not to understand what I’m referring to, which is the obsessive nature of Lee’s scrutiny of what is a trivial subject over his past several postings.
But you knew that, so why the bullshit?
Right, why’d I ask.
I’m satisfied that Lee in his heart of hearts knows the truth of it, and may feel a little shame, and I suspect you guys do as well, despite the self-serving nature of your responses.
And that’s enough for me.
Which obsession of things that are trivial? You started out by saying it was his obsession with weiners peen. You’re the one being disingenuous by saying lee is obsessing over trivial things. He’s followed the story, even taking several looks at the hacker theories. Now he’s calling out people who are blatantly lying, know that they are lying, and refuse to retract said lie. Is this what you consider trivial? Now weiner is under police investigation as to whether he was being inappropriate with a 17 year old. Is that trivial?
Maybe its trivial to you. But that you can’t understand why its not to the rest of us speaks to your character.
{ 1 trackback }