#Benghazi: Did Congress Have Access To Dylan Davie’s FBI Testimony?

An apology by CBS, a retraction of the entire 60 Minutes segment a pulled book — but as of right now, it’s all based on a refutation by unnamed FBI sources.

The major unanswered question as of right now (the evening of November 8th) about CBS’s retraction of the the Dylan Davies 60 Minutes piece and Simon & Shuster pulling his book The Embassy House is this : what is the FBI saying that Davies told them?

I found a November 6th Daily Beast article by Eli Lake called CIA Contractor Testimony Could Undermine Obama on Benghazi.

The whole thing is worth a read but this paragraph jumped out at me:

Congressional officials have told The Daily Beast that the House committee has reviewed transcripts of interviews the FBI conducted with all the eyewitnesses at Benghazi after the attacks. Earlier this year, the committee held closed sessions with CIA officers stationed at the Benghazi CIA annex and diplomatic security officers who were on the ground that evening. In his letter to Boehner, Nunes singles out Rep. Mike Rogers, the committee’s chairman, and its ranking Democrat for their leadership of a “non-political, efficient, and bipartisan investigative process.”

If the House Committee reviewed transcripts of all interviews the FBI conducted, that would include the interview that they did with Davies, right?

And that means that during the last week of controversy, some Congressmen were privy to the that testimony, right?

This could answer some questions.

By the way, Eli Lake at the Daily Beast is one of the reporters who did actually tracked down Benghazi whistleblower Dylan Davies for a November 2nd piece that got Davies on record for his side of the story.