Morality, Race & Pigford

I spend a good deal of time discussing the specifics of the Pigford case but I’d like to step back for a moment and discuss the moral and spiritual aspects of the case.

When I first met Andrew Breitbart, one of the things that struck me in our initial conversations was that he was deeply, viscerally antiracist. This is, of course, exactly the opposite of the story that liberals are constantly pushing where Breitbart is called a race baiter, apologist for racists and a racist himself. One reason that he gets painted this way is that he’s taken the risk that few have in today’s overheated knee-jerk political climate — he actually talks about the subject of race, and specifically the strange situation that African-Americans find themselves in the modern American political landscape,

I spent three months recently on the road in the South and doing interviews about the Pigford case. Almost all of the interviews were with black Americans who have an involvement with the case. I spoke to attorneys, farmers, activists and politicians with a variety of viewpoints. During this trip, I was struck time and again with just how poisonous our political climate has turned our views of race.

And if there’s one aspect of Pigford I consider the most important, it’s how this one case has played a significant role in hurting the state of race relations. When things stagnate, dangers soon follow. Just as stagnant water brings insects and disease, our stagnant politics of race has brought genuine hardships to our entire nation.

I hope that by exposing the mechanics of how the politics of race is played on Pigford, it will help people move closer to the moral ideal of judging men not by the color of their skin but by the content of their character. I realized before jumping into the Pigford investigation that it was a Gordian knot and I prayed that I would be able to rise to the challenge of explaining it in a way that healed racial division, not exacerbated it.

What I did not know when I started on the road was the extent to which "liberal" groups like Media Matters for America would fight to defend Pigford even when it was clear that the injustices in Pigford were often most unfair to the black community. I naïvely assumed that people on the left would see the unfairness being heaped upon black folks in this case and at least give the facts a fair hearing. Instead, I’ve seen people on left time and again bend over backwards to ignore the truth in Pigford, knowing full well that black farmers are being harmed.

Whenever I debate Pigford with people on the left, I always say “take my word for it”. I’ve offered time and again — talk to the farmers. I’ve offered to give the farmer’s phone numbers to people who attacked the Pigford investigation, because the farmer’s stories are passionate and detailed.

Not once – not one single time I’m aware of — has any critic of the Pigford investigation taken me up on this and spoken to the farmers.

Here’s what eats at me; I can walk away from the Pigford story. At the end of the day, it’s a project for me. But for these farmers, it’s their life. When Pigford defenders like Eric Boehlert and Media Matters, James Rucker and Color of Change, Anderson Cooper, and Ta-Nehisi Coates attack (or worse, ignore) the video interviews with these farmers, it’s really not me or Andrew Breitbart who they are hurting or demeaning – it’s those men who have been trying to bring the truth about Pigford to light for over a decade.

The Pigford story has had a much wider effect because it bolsters the feelings of both black people and white people that our political system is rigged against them. White folks can look askance a system where thousands of black people committed perjury and collected $50,000 checks. Black folks can shake their heads that nothing was done to correct the injustice of the USDA and that white folks like attorney Al Pires made millions. Everybody, black and white, comes away feeling that the dice have been loaded by the other side.

And this is the real moral disaster of Pigford. Those racial tensions that have been stirred up by petty hucksters like "Dr." John Boyd and Thomas Burrell are just a puppet show — a distraction so that politicians from Sanford Bishop to Chuck Grassley to Tom Vilasck to Barack Obama can grease the wheels of the political machine.

At root, Pigford is a story about fraud but it’s a fraud that goes far beyond financial concerns. It’s about the fraud that keeps us separate. It’s about the fraud that is intentionally perpetuated by profiteers and politicians to keep us from recognizing that we must remain vigilant, honest and brave to move beyond the stagnant waters of the entitlement mentality that has only served to keep our brothers and sisters down.

3 Comments

  1. Lee, that’s the general manipulation pattern of the Left – victimize specific constituent groups internally, so that they feel aggrieved and won’t stray from the party, while at the same time making sure those same individuals don’t take an honest accounting of their circumstances and whether or not the party they support is actually moving them positively along.

    It’s a society of victims all jockeying for attention and all under-cutting one another so that none of them gets ahead of the others, because if you stop pretending that some mysterious third party is responsible for your station in life, then you might actually have to take responsibility for your own actions. And if you’re getting some kind of financial kickback for your time, well, heck, what momma don’t know won’t hurt her and there’s plenty more where that came from. Greed and self-interest are the defining facets of humanity, regardless of where you live and who you are.

    Just look at the drum they are beating particularly loud about the haves and have-nots, railing against a rich White elite that most of their very own leaders also belong to. Trump bad! Koch bad! Waltons bad! Soros, Gates, Google, and Winfrey good?

    I think it’s also partly a Baby Boomer mentality – when you look at the rampant greed, the demographic consistently at the forefront in this day and age are Baby Boomers, trying to secure their fortunes (or lack thereof) before their impending retirement (which begins in earnest next year) at the expense of subsequent generations because of bad luck, poor planning, or general stupidity and shortsightedness (the “social security’s always going to be around, who needs a retirement account! Let’s go on vacation to some place expensive!” crew). This tends to be the same age group as most sitting congressmen, as well as Obama himself.

    Reply
  2. Great article Lee. You hit the nail on the head with this one man.

    Reply
  3. Well done. Very thoughtful and poignant.

    Reply

Leave a Reply